topic Re: Total Fat Nutrient - Enhanced vs Classic View in _Ask A Question for Item Management (IM)

Total Fat Nutrient - Enhanced vs Classic View

lvanhouten — Tue, 31 Aug 2021 23:28:39 GMT

The nutrient "TOTAL FAT" is not populating in the IM Enhanced view - but it is in the Classic view. How can I get this updated? Reference GTIN 10026700139687

Re: Total Fat Nutrient - Enhanced vs Classic View

jcharles — Wed, 01 Sep 2021 13:06:58 GMT

Lexi,

When you are in Enhanced and looking at the top of the Nutrient Information, look for Voluntary view and the you can see Total Fat.

Re: Total Fat Nutrient - Enhanced vs Classic View

lvanhouten — Wed, 01 Sep 2021 15:03:22 GMT

Yes, the nutrient Total Fat name is displayed in all 3 views, but the quantities are not coming over in the Enhanced while the quantities are in the Classic view.

See attachment.

Re: Total Fat Nutrient - Enhanced vs Classic View

jcharles — Wed, 01 Sep 2021 15:36:59 GMT

Lexi,

Apologies for the issues you are currently experiencing with Classic. The Classic view is no longer being maintained or updated going forward. We have been advising customers to use the enhanced view. The ehnaced view will really be the only option once Class is closed down. I would also recommend one of our FUSE templates to add Nutrients to the GTIN.

Re: Total Fat Nutrient - Enhanced vs Classic View

lvanhouten — Wed, 01 Sep 2021 16:02:18 GMT

@jcharles we are sending our data via XML, the values for Total Fat are included in the files and we have not received any validation errors for this attributes value. Curious now on what is getting sent to our recipients. Is this attribute omitted from the publications since it is not populated in the Enhanced view? I did review the IM Participant Dictionary and seems the valid value for TOTAL FAT has been changed to "FATNLEA" and we are sending it as "FAT". But again we are not receiving any validation errors for sending "FAT". Per recipients implementation guides, they want "FAT" to be sent for this attribute. Is this where the disconnect it? When did the valid value change from FAT to FATNLEA?

Re: Total Fat Nutrient - Enhanced vs Classic View

jcharles — Wed, 01 Sep 2021 19:06:34 GMT

@lvanhouten

I can see that you have FAT applied to the GTIN number you provided.

fatty acids, total saturated	FASAT
fat, total Synonyms: total lipid	FAT
fat, total; derived by analysis using continuous extraction	FATCE
total fat by NLEA definition (triglyceride equivalents of fatty acids)	FATNLEA
fatty acids, total trans	FATRN
fatty acids, total trans-monoenoic	FATRNM
fatty acids, total trans-polyenoic	FATRNP

The NLEA equals the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act FAT and FATNLEA are indeed different

Re: Total Fat Nutrient - Enhanced vs Classic View

lvanhouten — Wed, 01 Sep 2021 20:01:30 GMT

@jcharles

I guess I am confused. In IM for Nutrient Type Code, the drop down shows FAT = (FAT) Fat, total and I would expect to see the values in the Total Fat field in all views and also when using the 'Show NFP' button. Is that description incorrect? So now my question is how can I get the Total Fat field to populate in all views and when using 'Show NFP' button?

Re: Total Fat Nutrient - Enhanced vs Classic View

jcharles — Wed, 01 Sep 2021 21:07:29 GMT

Lexi,

You populated FAT in the Classic view and that is showing at the bottom of the Voluntary view in Enhanced

We need to populate this field near the top of the Voluntary section

To see this in the NFP button

Re: Total Fat Nutrient - Enhanced vs Classic View

lvanhouten — Wed, 01 Sep 2021 22:04:50 GMT

Is there something I need to do on my end to get the "Total Fat' populated for all views and the NFP button?

Re: Total Fat Nutrient - Enhanced vs Classic View

jcharles — Thu, 02 Sep 2021 13:57:46 GMT

@lvanhouten

Lexi,

Remove the FAT you entered manually as we will enter the content here. The Total Fat field is the second Nutrient Type Code listed in Enhanced, Voluntary view.

Re: Total Fat Nutrient - Enhanced vs Classic View

lvanhouten — Thu, 02 Sep 2021 14:55:46 GMT

@jcharles

Our nutritional data is not entered manually into IM - we send over an XML. So somehow when we send over the XML the data is not getting mapped correctly into IM. This will need to be corrected for all of our products, not just the GTIN I had as an example.

Re: Total Fat Nutrient - Enhanced vs Classic View

lvanhouten — Wed, 08 Sep 2021 15:56:30 GMT

@jcharles

Circling back on this issue - I still show the Total Fat is not getting mapped correctly in IM when sending our files via XML. Do I need to open a ticket to have the mapping corrected?

Re: Total Fat Nutrient - Enhanced vs Classic View

jcharles — Wed, 08 Sep 2021 17:27:26 GMT

Lexi,,

I have opened a ticket with our service desk and sent an email so we can discuss there.

Thank you!